Re: pgindent run? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pgindent run?
Date
Msg-id 25780.985272966@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgindent run?  (Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>)
Responses Re: pgindent run?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> writes:
> cvs annotate is a really, really handy tool, unfortunetly these
> indent runs remove this very useful tool as well as do a major job
> of obfuscating the code changes.

I think this is a good reason for *not* applying pgindent on an
incremental basis, but only once per release cycle.  That at least
lets cvs annotate be useful within a cycle.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: Call for platforms
Next
From: Marek PUBLICEWICZ
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Strange results of CURRENT_TIMESTAMP