Re: encoding names - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: encoding names
Date
Msg-id 25440.998234021@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: encoding names  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> However, this brings up the issue of how a backend will fail if the
> client provides a newer protocol version.  I think we should get it to
> send back its current protocol version and see if the client responds
> with a protocol version we can accept.

Why?  A client that wants to do this can retry with a lower version
number upon seeing the "unsupported protocol version" failure.  There's
no need to change the postmaster code --- indeed, doing so would negate
the main value of such a feature, namely being able to talk to *old*
postmasters.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch: use SCM_CREDS authentication over PF_LOCAL sockets
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: LIKE indexing