Re: ALTER INDEX OWNER TO - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: ALTER INDEX OWNER TO
Date
Msg-id 25378.1124114052@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to ALTER INDEX OWNER TO  (ohp@pyrenet.fr)
Responses Re: ALTER INDEX OWNER TO  (ohp@pyrenet.fr)
Re: ALTER INDEX OWNER TO  (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
List pgsql-hackers
ohp@pyrenet.fr writes:
> It seems that ALTER INDEX foo OWNER TO bar; doesn't work anymore.
> The error is foo is not a table or a view.

Yeah, I suppressed that alternative a few weeks ago, thinking that it
was not sensible since we don't really support having indexes owned
by anyone except the owner of the parent table.  Not sure what to do
about the fact that pg_dump has been emitting it though. Maybe reduce
the error to a warning, and make it a no-op?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: ALTER ROLES - questions
Next
From: Teodor Sigaev
Date:
Subject: Re: GiST memory usage