Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> It looks to me like the diffs are consistent with the idea that the
>>> test is using a copy of dblink that predates this patch ...
> I would think that the diffs would be significantly larger if that were
> the case. In fact, when was PG_MODULE_MAGIC first made mandatory?
Good point. So then why the failure?
regards, tom lane
