Re: Piggybacking vacuum I/O - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Piggybacking vacuum I/O
Date
Msg-id 25205.1169830072@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Piggybacking vacuum I/O  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Piggybacking vacuum I/O
List pgsql-hackers
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> I'd like to see still more evidence that it's a problem before we start 
> changing that piece of code. It has served us well for years.

What I see here is mostly evidence suggesting that we should consider
raising NUM_CLOG_BUFFERS, rather than anything more invasive.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Pavan Deolasee"
Date:
Subject: Re: Piggybacking vacuum I/O
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: autovacuum process handling