Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> > I'd like to see still more evidence that it's a problem before we start
> > changing that piece of code. It has served us well for years.
>
> What I see here is mostly evidence suggesting that we should consider
> raising NUM_CLOG_BUFFERS, rather than anything more invasive.
Added to TODO:
* Consider increasing NUM_CLOG_BUFFERS
-- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
