Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Win32 lost signals open item - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Win32 lost signals open item
Date
Msg-id 25185.1099342546@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Win32 lost signals open item  ("Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net> writes:
>> Huh?  Why?

> Because we need to write the duplicated socket structure/pipe handle to
> the parameter file. I guess we could create a separate parameter file
> just for these things, but that seemed a bit unnecessary.

Do we actually need to pass the handle, or could the subprocess reopen
the pipe for itself?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Magnus Hagander"
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Win32 lost signals open item
Next
From: "Magnus Hagander"
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Win32 lost signals open item