Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: GUC with units, details - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: GUC with units, details
Date
Msg-id 25181.1153868420@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: GUC with units, details  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: GUC with units, details  (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Bort, Paul wrote:
>> [ 1000 vs 1024 ]

> But in this case it's not practical.

Maybe I'm missing something, but I thought it was fairly common to use
"k" for 1000, "K" for 1024, etc (mnemonic: upper case for the larger
multiplier).  So I'd vote for accepting "KB" rather than "kB" ...
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: GUC with units, details
Next
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: GUC with units, details