Re: GUC with units, details - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Neil Conway
Subject Re: GUC with units, details
Date
Msg-id 1153874465.5444.11.camel@localhost
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: GUC with units, details  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: GUC with units, details  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 19:00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Maybe I'm missing something, but I thought it was fairly common to use
> "k" for 1000, "K" for 1024, etc (mnemonic: upper case for the larger
> multiplier).

Well, that only works for K vs. k: the SI prefix for mega is M (meaning
10^6), not "m". Similarly for "G".

Why it is "impractical" to use the IEC prefixes?

-Neil




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: GUC with units, details
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Resurrecting per-page cleaner for btree