Re: pre_load_libraries - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pre_load_libraries
Date
Msg-id 2508.1152761461@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pre_load_libraries  (Marc Munro <marc@bloodnok.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Marc Munro <marc@bloodnok.com> writes:
> ...  A better solution from my point of view would be
> to simply move the call to process_preload_libraries to a point after
> shared memory has been set up.  Is there some reason this could not be
> done?

That would make it impossible for a preloaded library to request any
shared memory of its own --- something that admittedly we don't have a
hook to support, but do we want to foreclose it permanently?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze
Next
From: Thomas Hallgren
Date:
Subject: Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze