Re: How filesystems matter with PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: How filesystems matter with PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id 2503.1275661530@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: How filesystems matter with PostgreSQL  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: How filesystems matter with PostgreSQL  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-performance
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On Friday 04 June 2010 14:17:35 Jon Schewe wrote:
>> XFS (logbufs=8): ~4 hours to finish
>> ext4: ~1 hour 50 minutes to finish
>> ext3: 15 minutes to finish
>> ext3 on LVM: 15 minutes to finish

> My guess is that some of the difference comes from barrier differences. ext4
> uses barriers by default, ext3 does not.

Or, to put it more clearly: the reason ext3 is fast is that it's unsafe.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance tuning for postgres
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: How filesystems matter with PostgreSQL