Re: J2SE 1.4 and other patches - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

Who is this?
----- Original Message -----
From: Barry Lind <barry@xythos.com>
To: Joseph Shraibman <jks@selectacast.net>
Cc: <Dave@micro-automation.net>; <pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 10:22 AM
Subject: Re: [JDBC] J2SE 1.4 and other patches


> Anyone can do that by submitting a patch.  I don't see anything special
> that needs to be done.
>
> --Barry
>
> Joseph Shraibman wrote:
>
> > Right.  And a maintainer needs to make a jdbc3 direcotry and modifiy the
> > ant files to use it when it detects a jdk of 1.4+
> >
> >
> > Dave Cramer wrote:
> >
> >> What do you see wrong with the build process?
> >>
> >> Ant is used to build the driver!
> >>
> >> Dave
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: pgsql-jdbc-owner@postgresql.org
> >> [mailto:pgsql-jdbc-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Joseph Shraibman
> >> Sent: October 16, 2001 5:45 PM
> >> To: Rene Pijlman
> >> Cc: Mark Lillywhite (pg-jdbc); pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org
> >> Subject: Re: [JDBC] J2SE 1.4 and other patches
> >>
> >>
> >> I think what most needs to be done is for someone to update the build
> >> process, so people who want to hack code will have somewhere to start
> >> from.
> >>
> >> Rene Pijlman wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> On 13 Oct 2001 11:16:07 +1000, you wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> I was just wondering if anyone is working on support for JDK1.4 for
> >>>> the postgresql drivers.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> Not AFAIK.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> It appears that there are some new methods defined
> >>>> in a few interfaces that need to be implemented (presumably to just
> >>>> throw the "unimplemented" exception?).
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> Do you mean JDBC 3.0 methods? What methods precisely? Are they
> >>> implementable?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Also, I have a patch for DatabaseMetaData to fix a bug in the
metadata
> >>>>
> >>
> >>>> returned for BigDecimals. I have already tried to submit this patch
> >>>> 2 or 3 times (to peter@retep) but never heard back. It's only about
> >>>> 4 LOC but it makes introspecting the database much better.
> >>>>
> >>>> Is this the place to post a patch, and if I do, am I likely to get a
> >>>> response?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> You can send patches to the pgsql-patches@postgresql.org list,
> >>> preferably with a CC to this list. Yes, you will get a response.
> >>> Usually, a patch is applied within a week (if the patch is good, of
> >>> course).
> >>>
> >>> If a patch to the JDBC driver needs discussion first, that should be
> >>> on this list.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> René Pijlman <rene@lab.applinet.nl>
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------(end of
broadcast)---------------------------
> >>> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html