Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Alexander Korotkov
> <aekorotkov@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I found that code of gistchoose doesn't follow it's logic. Idea of
>> gistchoose is that first column penalty is more important than penalty of
>> second column. If we meet same penalty values of first column then we choose
>> minimal penalty value of second column among them.
> Nice catch. Thanks for the patch, which I have now committed.
Should we backpatch that?
regards, tom lane
