Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> * Andres Freund (andres@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
>> How about flipping the default for log_checkpoints instead? There really
>> isn't a good reason for having it disabled by default.
> Yeah, I agree with this- it's extremely useful information and it's
> really not that verbose in general..
-1. Every time we've turned on default logging of routine events,
there's been pushback and it was eventually turned off again as log spam.
I guarantee you that logging checkpoints will be seen as log spam, except
by people who are actually having trouble with that behavior, which is
a small minority.
I'm not really convinced that there's a problem here that needs fixing
at all, but certainly putting log_checkpoints on by default is not an
acceptable fix.
regards, tom lane
