Re: [HACKERS] Current sources? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Current sources?
Date
Msg-id 2383.895952030@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Current sources?  (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Current sources?  (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Well, the upshot from here is that having done "cvs checkout pgsql"
once, I can do either
    cvs update            -- within pgsql
    cvs -d blahblah checkout pgsql    -- in parent directory
and they both seem to work and do the same thing (although with no
updates committed in the last two hours, it's hard to be sure).

If I omit the -d option to the cvs checkout, it fails; it does not
know enough to fetch the repository address from pgsql/CVS/Root.
But cvs update is cool.

Dunno why it doesn't work for Marc.  I'm running cvs 1.9; you?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Current sources?
Next
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Current sources?