Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: log_duration is redundant, no? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: log_duration is redundant, no?
Date
Msg-id 23470.1157749142@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: log_duration is redundant, no?  ("Guillaume Smet" <guillaume.smet@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: log_duration is redundant, no?  ("Guillaume Smet" <guillaume.smet@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
"Guillaume Smet" <guillaume.smet@gmail.com> writes:
> Do you want me to propose a patch or do you prefer to work on it
> yourself?

It's done already ...
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Guillaume Smet"
Date:
Subject: Re: log_duration is redundant, no?
Next
From: elein
Date:
Subject: Re: Domains and subtypes, a brief proposal