Tom,
On 9/8/06, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> It seems like we should either remove the separate log_duration boolean
> or make it work as he suggests. I'm leaning to the second answer now.
Do you want me to propose a patch or do you prefer to work on it
yourself? If so, do we keep the log_duration name or do we change it
to log_all_duration or another more appropriate name?
I attached the little patch I use to apply on our packages. I can work
on it to make it apply to HEAD and update the documentation.
I suppose we should also change the FE/BE protocol logging accordingly
but ISTM you already planned to change it for other reasons.
--
Guillaume
