Re: actualized SQL/PSM patch - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: actualized SQL/PSM patch
Date
Msg-id 23275.1207199055@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: actualized SQL/PSM patch  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: actualized SQL/PSM patch  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-patches
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> ...  I suspect anyone wanting to migrate
> their existing SQL/PSM stuff to Postgres will be less than impressed by
> our "function body as a string" mechanism.

Yeah, that's the other little problem with claiming standards-compliance
as a reason for doing this.  We'd really have to suck it up and figure
some other way of parsing function bodies.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: actualized SQL/PSM patch
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: actualized SQL/PSM patch