Re: actualized SQL/PSM patch - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: actualized SQL/PSM patch
Date
Msg-id 200804031529.m33FTOk11519@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: actualized SQL/PSM patch  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> > ...  I suspect anyone wanting to migrate
> > their existing SQL/PSM stuff to Postgres will be less than impressed by
> > our "function body as a string" mechanism.
>
> Yeah, that's the other little problem with claiming standards-compliance
> as a reason for doing this.  We'd really have to suck it up and figure
> some other way of parsing function bodies.

Oh, I understand now, that we aren't going to be 100% standards
compliant based on how we quote our function bodies --- I understand
Andrew's point now.

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: actualized SQL/PSM patch
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Configurable Penalty Costs for Levenshtein