Re: libpq_r - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: libpq_r
Date
Msg-id 23222.1059058086@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: libpq_r  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Now I see what you are saying, that _REENTRANT just makes it reentrant,
> and doesn't have a downside in terms of performance.

That's at best an unsupported assertion.  Why would the platform bother
with supplying two copies of libc if they didn't think there was a
performance hit?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Lee Kindness
Date:
Subject: Re: libpq_r
Next
From: Lee Kindness
Date:
Subject: Re: libpq_r