Re: libpq_r - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Lee Kindness
Subject Re: libpq_r
Date
Msg-id 16159.62080.671712.645790@kelvin.csl.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: libpq_r  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: libpq_r  (Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane writes:> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:> > Now I see what you are saying, that _REENTRANT just
makesit reentrant,> > and doesn't have a downside in terms of performance.> That's at best an unsupported assertion.
Whywould the platform bother> with supplying two copies of libc if they didn't think there was a> performance hit?
 

Better remove transactions then, yeah? Performace hit! Profile it and
see how minor (or likely non-existent) it is...

L.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: libpq_r
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: libpq_r