Re: A qsort template - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: A qsort template
Date
Msg-id 232026.1653000221@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: A qsort template  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Responses Re: A qsort template
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> writes:
> On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 1:12 PM Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote:
>> Should these debug lines be removed ?
>> 
>> elog(DEBUG1, "qsort_tuple");

> I agree -- DEBUG1 seems too chatty for something like this. DEBUG2
> would be more appropriate IMV. Though I don't feel very strongly about
> it.

Given the lack of context identification, I'd put the usefulness of
these in production at close to zero.  +1 for removing them
altogether, or failing that, downgrade to DEBUG5 or so.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: A qsort template
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 15beta1 crash on mips64el in pg_regress/triggers