Re: [Plperlng-devel] Re: Concern about new PL/Perl - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [Plperlng-devel] Re: Concern about new PL/Perl
Date
Msg-id 23144.1100837474@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Plperlng-devel] Re: Concern about new PL/Perl  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: [Plperlng-devel] Re: Concern about new PL/Perl  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Re: [Plperlng-devel] Re: Concern about new PL/Perl  ("Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
>> I would agree that seems a little odd ;). Would this be something we
>> want done for 8.0?

> I think we'd better.   Otherwise, people will get used to the broken syntax.

Agreed.  Someone's going to step up and patch this, no?

(Not me --- I've already wasted more hours than I could afford this week
on plperl.)
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Can postgresql accept mutliple connections in the same instance?
Next
From: Dru
Date:
Subject: Re: Can postgresql accept mutliple connections in the same