Re: pgsql: Separate block sampling functions - Mailing list pgsql-committers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pgsql: Separate block sampling functions
Date
Msg-id 23094.1431988576@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgsql: Separate block sampling functions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-committers
I wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>> What is the current state of this? Are we sticking with what Tom
>> classified as drive-by breakage?

> Since I was the one complaining, I'm willing to do the legwork to
> insert a compatibility shim.  I probably won't get to it today though,
> this being release wrap day.  In the meantime please leave
> FileTextArrayFDW as-is.

I put in a shim --- crake should be happy again on its next run.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-committers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: pgsql: Put back a backwards-compatible version of sampling support func
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: pgsql: Attach ON CONFLICT SET ... WHERE to the correct planstate.