Re: pgsql: Separate block sampling functions - Mailing list pgsql-committers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pgsql: Separate block sampling functions
Date
Msg-id 14084.1431960831@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgsql: Separate block sampling functions  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: pgsql: Separate block sampling functions
Re: pgsql: Separate block sampling functions
List pgsql-committers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> What is the current state of this? Are we sticking with what Tom
> classified as drive-by breakage?

Since I was the one complaining, I'm willing to do the legwork to
insert a compatibility shim.  I probably won't get to it today though,
this being release wrap day.  In the meantime please leave
FileTextArrayFDW as-is.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-committers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Separate block sampling functions
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Recursively fsync() the data directory after a crash.