Re: Parallel workers stats in pg_stat_database - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Benoit Lobréau
Subject Re: Parallel workers stats in pg_stat_database
Date
Msg-id 22b54026-e0fa-491d-918f-771cb50c1221@dalibo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Parallel workers stats in pg_stat_database  (Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 9/4/24 08:46, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:> What about moving the tests to 
places where it's "guaranteed" to get
> parallel workers involved? For example, a "parallel_maint_workers" only test
> could be done in vacuum_parallel.sql.

Thank you ! I was too focussed on the stat part and missed the obvious.
It's indeed better with this file.

... Which led me to discover that the area I choose to gather my stats 
is wrong (parallel_vacuum_end), it only traps workers allocated for 
parallel_vacuum_cleanup_all_indexes() and not 
parallel_vacuum_bulkdel_all_indexes().

Back to the drawing board...

-- 
Benoit Lobréau
Consultant
http://dalibo.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: scalability bottlenecks with (many) partitions (and more)
Next
From: Nitin Motiani
Date:
Subject: Re: race condition in pg_class