Re: mixed, named notation support - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bernd Helmle
Subject Re: mixed, named notation support
Date
Msg-id 22F4E10A4E336B325652B25B@teje
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: mixed, named notation support  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: mixed, named notation support  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
List pgsql-hackers
--On Montag, August 03, 2009 12:38:48 -0400 Robert Haas 
<robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm a little confused here.  We are 19 days into a 31 day CommitFest;
> you are almost three weeks too late to add a patch to the queue.
> Unless you can convince a friendly committer to pick this up out of
> sequence, I think the only patch that is under consideration here is
> the one that has been being discussed on this thread for the last 17
> days.  I sent several notes adding for all patches to be added to
> commitfest.postgresql.org prior to the start of CommitFest; AFAIK,
> this one was never added.

Well, i already noted that in the "named and mixed notation" thread 
actually two patches were involved, see 
<http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-rrreviewers/2009-07/msg00016.php>.

Since Steve's changes were so small, i considered it to be an "extension" 
to Pavels patch, without treating it separately to commit. In my opinion it 
wouldn't make sense to commit those changes to plpgsql _without_ having 
Pavels functionality. I have to admit that i saw Tom's complaint about 
making AS a special keyword in plpgsql, but decided to leave the decision 
wether we want to commit this or not up to a committer. I took the efforts 
to get the attached patches there in a reviewable state then instead.

Please note that Steve's suggestion is linked into the commitfest since 
2009-05-21, too.

--  Thanks
                   Bernd


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Steve Prentice
Date:
Subject: Re: mixed, named notation support
Next
From: Bernd Helmle
Date:
Subject: Re: bytea vs. pg_dump