Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT
Date
Msg-id 22907.1391535290@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> If someone volunteered to pay for the storage, I'd be prepared to make 
> some time to create an AMI to reduce the startup time dramatically. 
> Basically it would be "boot the AMI and start testing your patches". I'd 
> even make it as friendly as possible for people who don't like to get 
> too far from unix-ish environments.

My own opinion is that I've already wasted untold man-hours thanks to
the random porting problems induced by Windows, a platform that I never
have and never will care about personally.  I will *not* spend my own
time doing tests that someone else could do.  If we can't get some
effort contributed by someone who does use that platform, I'm personally
prepared to declare the entire damn thing no longer supported.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation