Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
>>> Allow optional () after current_user, session_user, user, current_time,
>>> current_timestamp, current_date for ODBC compatibility.
>> It's not apparent to me that this is an improvement in our standards
>> compatibility.
> ODBC is generally thought of as being a standard.
True ... if it's okay with Thomas then I won't object.
regards, tom lane
