Re: HOT for PostgreSQL 8.3 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: HOT for PostgreSQL 8.3
Date
Msg-id 22871.1171259286@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: HOT for PostgreSQL 8.3  (Hannu Krosing <hannu@skype.net>)
Responses Re: HOT for PostgreSQL 8.3  (mark@mark.mielke.cc)
List pgsql-hackers
Hannu Krosing <hannu@skype.net> writes:
> How about adding a new 2-byte field to header for in-page c_tid poiner
> for HOT ?

We just finished sweating blood to get the tuple header size down to 23
bytes from 27 (which saves 8 bytes not 4 if MAXALIGN=8).  We are not
going to blow that again on HOT.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Foreign keys for non-default datatypes, redux
Next
From: Jeremy Drake
Date:
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] == PostgreSQL Weekly News - February 11 2007 ==