Re: WIP: Deferrable unique constraints - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: WIP: Deferrable unique constraints
Date
Msg-id 22630.1248109212@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WIP: Deferrable unique constraints  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Responses Re: WIP: Deferrable unique constraints  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes:
>> Please, no.  Constraints are not a datatype.  Do not copy the brain-dead
>> decision that put ri_triggers there.

> Does that mean ri_triggers should come out of there?

Not as long as we're on CVS --- it isn't worth the loss of history.
I might think about it when/if we move to git.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] Avoid manual shift-and-test logic in AllocSetFreeIndex
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SE-PgSQL/tiny rev.2193