Re: WIP: Deferrable unique constraints - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Fetter
Subject Re: WIP: Deferrable unique constraints
Date
Msg-id 20090720185937.GB32219@fetter.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WIP: Deferrable unique constraints  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: WIP: Deferrable unique constraints  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 01:00:12PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes:
> >> Please, no.  Constraints are not a datatype.  Do not copy the brain-dead
> >> decision that put ri_triggers there.
> 
> > Does that mean ri_triggers should come out of there?
> 
> Not as long as we're on CVS --- it isn't worth the loss of history.
> I might think about it when/if we move to git.

As far as you're concerned, what's blocking that?

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SE-PgSQL/tiny rev.2193
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_migrator not setting values of sequences?