Re: Proposal: generate_iterator functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Proposal: generate_iterator functions
Date
Msg-id 22538.1192715798@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposal: generate_iterator functions  ("Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Proposal: generate_iterator functions
Re: Proposal: generate_iterator functions
List pgsql-hackers
"Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure@gmail.com> writes:
> There was a very similar proposal a little while back (google:
> array_to_set).  I think I like those names better since you are
> returning a set, not an iterator :-).

I agree, this is a very poor choice of name.  There should be some
reference to arrays in it, for one thing.

generate_array_subscripts() maybe?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Why copy_relation_data only use wal whenWALarchivingis enabled
Next
From: Decibel!
Date:
Subject: dblink un-named connection doesn't get re-used