Re: Proposal: generate_iterator functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: Proposal: generate_iterator functions
Date
Msg-id 162867790710180709g144c8c62w35ae040548ce0958@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposal: generate_iterator functions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
2007/10/18, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
> "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure@gmail.com> writes:
> > There was a very similar proposal a little while back (google:
> > array_to_set).  I think I like those names better since you are
> > returning a set, not an iterator :-).
>
> I agree, this is a very poor choice of name.  There should be some
> reference to arrays in it, for one thing.
>
> generate_array_subscripts() maybe?
>
why not?

Pavel


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Decibel!
Date:
Subject: dblink un-named connection doesn't get re-used
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Why copy_relation_data only use wal whenWALarchivingis enabled