Re: change in behaviour for format_type() call - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: change in behaviour for format_type() call
Date
Msg-id 22368.1519919384@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to change in behaviour for format_type() call  (Rushabh Lathia <rushabh.lathia@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: change in behaviour for format_type() call  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Rushabh Lathia <rushabh.lathia@gmail.com> writes:
> Commit a26116c6cbf4117e8efaa7cfc5bacc887f01517f changed the behaviour
> for format_type.
> ...
> Is this expected behaviour? attaching patch to get back the older
> behaviour.

I don't see anything in the commit message or linked discussion to
indicate that any visible behavior change was intended, so I think
you're right, this is a bug.  Will check and push your patch.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Euler Taveira
Date:
Subject: Re: row filtering for logical replication
Next
From: Jesper Pedersen
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Fix performance degradation of contended LWLock on NUMA