Re: pgstattuple extension for indexes - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pgstattuple extension for indexes
Date
Msg-id 22273.1155556692@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgstattuple extension for indexes  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-patches
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> I was thinking, isn't it a lot cleaner to define the functions to use
> OUT parameters instead of having to define a custom type for each?

Not really --- it's a bit less notation maybe, but if he's got it
written like that already, I see no need to change it.

> Also, in 8.2 there is a uninstall SQL script -- ISTM you should put the
> DROP commands there, not in the install script.

Agreed.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: pgstattuple extension for indexes
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Forcing current WAL file to be archived