Re: [PATCHES] Forcing current WAL file to be archived - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: [PATCHES] Forcing current WAL file to be archived
Date
Msg-id 1155564956.2649.30.camel@holly
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] Forcing current WAL file to be archived  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, 2006-08-13 at 22:50 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > This issue is closed, right?
>
> We've agreed we need two functions, but it's not done yet.  Seems pretty
> trivial though ...

Just back from India. I'll work on this tonight.

--
  Simon Riggs
  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Google SoC--Idea Request
Next
From: Perez
Date:
Subject: Re: An Idea for planner hints