Re: Fixing target-column indirection in INSERT with multiple VALUES - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Fixing target-column indirection in INSERT with multiple VALUES
Date
Msg-id 22233.1469658586@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fixing target-column indirection in INSERT with multiple VALUES  (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> this would require an initdb because it changes the
>> representation of stored rules for cases like this,

> So pg_upgrade would not work at all for the version this goes into,

No, pg_upgrade wouldn't have a problem.  The entire point of pg_upgrade
is to cope with system catalog changes.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kevin Grittner
Date:
Subject: Re: Fixing target-column indirection in INSERT with multiple VALUES
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: old_snapshot_threshold allows heap:toast disagreement