Re: CommitFest Status Summary - 2010-02-14 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: CommitFest Status Summary - 2010-02-14
Date
Msg-id 22156.1266456745@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: CommitFest Status Summary - 2010-02-14  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: CommitFest Status Summary - 2010-02-14
List pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> * Fix large object support in pg_dump.  I think this is just waiting
>> for a second opinion on whether the approach is correct.  I've been
>> meaning to look at it, but haven't gotten enough round tuits; maybe
>> someone else would like to take a look?  This is an open item, so we
>> should really try to deal with it.

> Yeah, I think this is a "must fix for alpha" item.  Will look at it
> tomorrow, god willin an the creek don't rise (or, given the weather
> around here: the power stays on).

I've applied that patch after some revisions.

The only thing still showing as open in the CommitFest webpage is
the last plperl patch.  I think that's actually done but not marked
as committed; Andrew?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Clemmons
Date:
Subject: Michael Clemmons wants to stay in touch on LinkedIn
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Streaming replication on win32, still broken