Re: rm -rf in initlocation violates Rule of Least Surprise - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: rm -rf in initlocation violates Rule of Least Surprise
Date
Msg-id 22120.1067959975@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: rm -rf in initlocation violates Rule of Least Surprise  (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes:
> On Fri, 2003-10-24 at 22:59, Clifford T. Matthews wrote:
>> Using initlocation from postgresql 7.3.4 I managed to blow away some
>> important data tonight due to "exit_nicely"'s "rm -rf".

> Has there been any followup on this? IMHO this is a bug we should fix.

I'm disinclined to expend any effort at all on initlocation, since it's
going to disappear when we have tablespaces ... which I would like to
believe will happen for 7.5.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Repeatedly breaking indexes
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Possible bug in conversion_create.sql