Re: Yet another failure mode in pg_upgrade - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Yet another failure mode in pg_upgrade
Date
Msg-id 22095.1346526417@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Yet another failure mode in pg_upgrade  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Yet another failure mode in pg_upgrade  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> On Sat, Sep  1, 2012 at 02:43:35PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm inclined to think that the "no sockdir" case is broken and you
>> should get rid of it.  If you're starting a postmaster, you can and
>> should tell it a sockdir, period.  If you're running a live check this
>> code is all moot anyway.

> I don't think you understand.  The "no sockdir" case is only for live
> checks of pre-9.1 old servers, because we can't find the socket
> directory being used.  Everything else uses the local directory for the
> socket.  If we remove that case, we can't do live checks on pre-9.1
> servers.

If it's a live check, then (a) you aren't restarting the postmaster,
and (b) you wouldn't want to lock out TCP anyway.  So adding
--listen-addresses to the string seems pointless and/or wrong.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Yet another failure mode in pg_upgrade
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Yet another failure mode in pg_upgrade