Re: gram.y => preproc.y - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: gram.y => preproc.y
Date
Msg-id 21981.1226609869@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to gram.y => preproc.y  (Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: gram.y => preproc.y  (Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org> writes:
> That's what I did first, but Magnus had a good reasoning to not keep preproc.y
> if we keep preproc.c in our tarball. And I agreed that there doesn't seem to be
> an advantage.

Other than whether it *works*, you mean?

make will not be happy if it has a dependency from preproc.c to preproc.y
and preproc.y is not there.  Please don't mess with this.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Grzegorz Jaskiewicz
Date:
Subject: Re: Simple postgresql.conf wizard
Next
From: Michael Meskes
Date:
Subject: Re: gram.y => preproc.y