Re: gram.y => preproc.y - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Meskes
Subject Re: gram.y => preproc.y
Date
Msg-id 20081113204730.GA17142@trantor.fam-meskes.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: gram.y => preproc.y  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 03:10:04PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>   clean distclean:
> !     rm -f keywords.c *.o ecpg$(X) preproc.y
> 
> Actually, we want to fix it so that preproc.y is treated like preproc.c,
> ie, it's part of the shipped tarballs even though it's no longer in CVS.

That's what I did first, but Magnus had a good reasoning to not keep preproc.y
if we keep preproc.c in our tarball. And I agreed that there doesn't seem to be
an advantage.

Michael
-- 
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes@jabber.org
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: gram.y => preproc.y
Next
From: "Jonah H. Harris"
Date:
Subject: Re: Simple postgresql.conf wizard