Re: automatically generating node support functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: automatically generating node support functions
Date
Msg-id 217471.1627334727@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: automatically generating node support functions  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>> The first eight patches are to clean up various inconsistencies to make 
>> parsing or generation easier.

> Are there any concerns about the patches 0001 through 0008?  Otherwise, 
> maybe we could get those out of the way.

I looked through those and don't have any complaints (though I just
eyeballed them, I didn't see what a compiler would say).  I see
you pushed a couple of them already.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Delegating superuser tasks to new security roles (Was: Granting control of SUSET gucs to non-superusers)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Delegating superuser tasks to new security roles (Was: Granting control of SUSET gucs to non-superusers)