Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I thought the consensus of the discussion was that this was not
>>> necessary. It sure doesn't strike me as a good idea.
> Also, keep in mind that in the end most folks will be building under
> MinGW using a release tarball, that has those output files. We haven't
> gotten a MinGW release yet, so they have to build all the stuff.
Well, that's a fair argument, but why don't you get Marc to set up
nightly snapshots for the WIN32_DEV branch? That only costs cycles
in the short term. Polluting CVS with updates to derived files will
cost us CVS storage forever.
regards, tom lane
