On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> >> Tom Lane wrote:
> >>> I thought the consensus of the discussion was that this was not
> >>> necessary. It sure doesn't strike me as a good idea.
>
> > Also, keep in mind that in the end most folks will be building under
> > MinGW using a release tarball, that has those output files. We haven't
> > gotten a MinGW release yet, so they have to build all the stuff.
>
> Well, that's a fair argument, but why don't you get Marc to set up
> nightly snapshots for the WIN32_DEV branch? That only costs cycles
> in the short term. Polluting CVS with updates to derived files will
> cost us CVS storage forever.
Easy enough, and done ...
ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/win32_dev
will have it run nighty like the regular snapshot
