Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 5:43 PM Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> wrote:
> >
> > Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 3:44 PM Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I got a syntax error when using the command according to the existing
> > > > documentation. The output_plugin parameter needs to be passed too.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Why do we need it for physical slots?
> >
> > Sure we don't, the missing curly brackets seem to be the problem. I used the
> > other form of the command for reference, which therefore might need a minor
> > fix too.
> >
>
> Instead of adding additional '{}', can't we simply use:
> { <literal>PHYSICAL</literal> [ <literal>RESERVE_WAL</literal> ] |
> <literal>LOGICAL</literal> <replaceable
> class="parameter">output_plugin</replaceable> } [
> <literal>EXPORT_SNAPSHOT</literal> |
> <literal>NOEXPORT_SNAPSHOT</literal> | <literal>USE_SNAPSHOT</literal>
> | <literal>TWO_PHASE</literal> ]
Do you mean changing
CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT slot_name [ TEMPORARY ] { PHYSICAL [ RESERVE_WAL ] | LOGICAL output_plugin [ EXPORT_SNAPSHOT |
NOEXPORT_SNAPSHOT| USE_SNAPSHOT | TWO_PHASE ] }
to
CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT slot_name [ TEMPORARY ] { PHYSICAL [ RESERVE_WAL ] | LOGICAL output_plugin } [ EXPORT_SNAPSHOT
|NOEXPORT_SNAPSHOT | USE_SNAPSHOT | TWO_PHASE ]
?
I'm not sure, IMHO that would still allow for commands like
CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT slot_name PHYSICAL output_plugin
--
Antonin Houska
Web: https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
