Re: The service did not respond to the start.. - Mailing list pgsql-cygwin

From Dave Page
Subject Re: The service did not respond to the start..
Date
Msg-id 214E9C0A75426D47A876A2FD8A07426E974A@salem.vale-housing.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to The service did not respond to the start..  (Liviu Taloi <ltaloi@yahoo.com>)
Responses Re: The service did not respond to the start..
List pgsql-cygwin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason@tishler.net]
> Sent: 09 May 2002 17:52
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Michael Adler; Liviu Taloi; Henshall, Stuart - WCP;
> pgsql-cygwin@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [CYGWIN] The service did not respond to the start..
>
>
> Dave,
>
> On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 04:55:11PM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Michael Adler [mailto:adler@glimpser.org]
> > > Sent: 09 May 2002 16:40
> > > Can anyone else chime in on ipc-daemon on XP? I've had about
> > > a 40% success history in which it just works.
> >
> > I've had similar troubles with recent versions but find
> that 1.09 runs
> > well on XP & 2K Pro using the Local System account.
>
> We really should try to solve this problem with the current
> cygipc before downgrading in defeat.  Sorry, but I can't
> reproduce this problem so I can't help to debug.

I'm all for fixing these things, but at the time (aside from needing to
get things working so I could work on pgAdmin) I had just read a message
(I think from you in fact) about the upcoming builtin ipc support in
Cygwin and having seen no other reports of similar problems figured that
it was something peculiar to my system (which does get hacked about a
fair bit) and wasn't worth the trouble anyway as it would soon be
obsolete.

Of course, in hindsight I was probably 100% wrong but hey, why break the
habit of a lifetime :-)

Regards, Dave.

BTW Are you aware there is currently a rather busy thread about native
Windows/Beos ports on -hackers which is currently drifting towards a
cutdown Cygwin version?

pgsql-cygwin by date:

Previous
From: Jason Tishler
Date:
Subject: Re: The service did not respond to the start..
Next
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: Re: The service did not respond to the start..