Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk> writes:
> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> Tom> If we're going to do that, I think it needs to be in 9.4. Are
> Tom> you going to work up a patch?
> Do we want a decision on the fn_extra matter first, or shall I do one
> patch for the econtext, and a following one for fn_extra?
I think they're somewhat independent, and probably best patched
separately. In any case orderedsetagg.c's use of fn_extra is a local
matter that we'd not really have to fix in 9.4, except to the extent
that you think third-party code might copy it.
regards, tom lane
