Re: ARC patent - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Calvin Sun
Subject Re: ARC patent
Date
Msg-id 2127390E83EFBB4C9D0CE03817E083A692F23F@ausmail2k2.aus.pervasive.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to ARC patent  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Nov 2002 is the date of filing the patent application, while May 2004 is the publish date. For regular patent
application,the USPTO will treat that application with secrecy for the first 18 months of the examining process. About
18months after the application, the USPTO will publish the patent application. 

For most companies with deep pocket, they never publish new papers/ideas without filing a regular or provisional patent
applicationfirst. 


-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:andrew@dunslane.net]
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 3:14 PM
To: John Hansen
Cc: Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SD; Jan Wieck; Tom Lane; Neil Conway;
pgsql-hackers
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] ARC patent




John Hansen wrote:

>>>Unfortunately no. The document that inspired me to adapt ARC for
>>>PostgreSQL is from the USENIX File & Storage Technologies
>>>
>>>
>>Conference
>>
>>
>>>(FAST), March 31, 2003, San Francisco, CA.
>>>
>>>
>
>Ahemm,... Isn't the patent lodged on may 20, 2004, AFTER you read the document from the above conference?
>
>


The patent claim was filed on *November 14, 2002 according to the docs.
It might have been updated in May 2004, or some other action, but the
filing date is the one that counts. You can certainly trust IBM not to
let their guys preclude a patent they intend to file by doing prior
publication.

cheers

andrew
*

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: ARC patent
Next
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: ARC patent